ReviewCureus2026
The Role of Intraoperative Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography in Reducing Anastomotic Leak After Colorectal Resection: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anastomotic leak (AL) has a reported incidence of 3%-19% after colorectal resection. The aim of this Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 compliant systematic review is to determine whether intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) reduces clinically significant anastomotic leak and improves peri-operative outcomes compared with standard white-light assessment in adults undergoing colorectal resection with primary anastomosis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science from inception to March 2026. Eligible study designs included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) enrolling adults undergoing elective colorectal resection with primary anastomosis and comparing intra-operative ICG-FA with standard white-light assessment. The primary outcome was "clinically relevant anastomotic leak" as defined by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Six RCTs enrolling 4,366 randomised patients, of whom 4,221 were evaluable: FLAG (n=377), De Nardi et al. (n=240), EssentiAL (n=839), AVOID (n=931), ICG-COLORAL (n=1,136), and IntAct (n=698). EssentiAL was the only trial to demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in all-grade AL (7.6% (32/422) vs 11.8% (49/417); relative risk (RR) 0.645; p=0.041) and grade B/C AL (4.7% (20/422) vs 8.2% (34/417); p=0.044). AVOID, ICG-COLORAL, and IntAct did not meet their primary endpoints but consistently favoured left-sided resections in subgroup analyses. IntAct showed an absolute five percentage-point reduction in grade B/C AL (10% (36/343) vs 15% (54/355); adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.667; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.419-1.060; p=0.087). No serious ICG-related adverse events were reported. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) certainty of evidence for the primary outcome was moderate. Current RCT evidence does not support routine ICG-FA across all colorectal anastomoses. Leak rates are most consistently reduced for left-sided and low rectal resections where inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) ligation may compromise anastomotic perfusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.