Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42891489›Full record

ArticleStatistica Sinica2026

WIN RATIO FOR PARTIALLY ORDERED DATA.

Lu Mao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistica Sinica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lu MaoDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Funding

Novel Statistical Methods for Complex Time-to-Event Data in Cardiovascular Clinical TrialsR01HL149875 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Lu Mao · 2020 to 2026
$2.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL149875
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The win ratio, initially developed for time-to-event data, can be extended to any data type equipped with a partial order. We study this extension in both nonparametric inference and semiparametric regression. We begin by formulating the win ratio as an estimand of contrast between two populations with partially ordered responses, showing that it reduces to the familiar odds ratio in the case of binary data. For hypothesis testing, we prove that the empirical two-sample win ratio is consistent against stochastically ordered distributions and efficient against proportional odds alternatives under a total order. In regression, we model the conditional win ratio multiplicatively against covariates, extending logistic regression from binary to partially ordered responses. This model is implied by a generalized continuation-ratio logit model but requires fewer assumptions on the relationship between response levels. To make inference, we construct a class of weighted

Indexed as

Continuation ratioLogistic regressionOdds ratioOrdinal dataStochastic orderU-statistic

Identifiers

PMID42891489
PMCPMC13675090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.