Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42891484›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Fertile Ground in the OR: Rewriting the Narrative on Family in Plastic Surgery Training.

Nicole K Le, Meredith G Moore, Michael Harrington

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicole K LePlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, USA.
Meredith G MoorePlastic Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, USA.
Michael HarringtonPlastic Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This editorial discusses the possibility of family life and plastic surgery residency successfully coexisting when training programs intentionally foster supportive cultures, flexible policies, and equitable parental leave. Drawing on personal experiences from a highly family-friendly program, together with emerging literature on pregnancy, parenthood, childcare, and career advancement in surgery, we challenge the notion that residents must choose between surgical excellence and family life. Some practical strategies, including shared workload, flexible scheduling, lactation support, peer mentorship, childcare assistance, and visible role models, may help address the barriers that resident parents face while supporting professional development and personal well-being. Ultimately, we contend that programs supporting residents' family goals strengthen the specialty by promoting wellness, inclusivity, and long-term retention, particularly of women in academic plastic surgery.

Indexed as

family-friendly trainingparenthoodplastic surgery residencyresidencysurgical education

Identifiers

PMID42891484
PMCPMC13675073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.