Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42891474›Full record

ArticleAdvanced biomedical research2026

Comparison of the Diagnostic Value of Ultrasound and Rotterdam CT Scoring Criterion Used for Measuring Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in the Prognosis of the Mortality and Disability Level of Patients with Head Trauma.

Farhad Heydari, Mohammad Nasr-Esfahani, Mehrdad Esmailian, Mohsen Salemi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced biomedical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Farhad HeydariDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Mohammad Nasr-EsfahaniDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Mehrdad EsmailianDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Mohsen SalemiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Considering that the measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) can be easily performed by ultrasound, and previous studies have addressed its possible association with brain damage, the very aim of the present study was to compare the diagnostic value of ultrasound and Rotterdam CT scoring (RCTS) criterion used for measuring ONSD in the prognosis of the mortality and disability level of patients with head trauma. Materials and Methods: The prospective cohort study was performed on 142 patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). CT scan was performed for all patients, and the results were recorded. However, the average ONSD values for both eyes were measured using ultrasound and recorded. Moreover, the patient's level of disability and outcome were evaluated and recorded based on the RCTS classification and the Glasgow coma scale. Results: The diagnostic value of RCTS had the cut-off value of greater than 2 in the prognosis of patients' mortality (sensitivity: 76.92% and specificity: 73.28%) and the cut-off value of greater than 2 in the prognosis of patients' disability level (sensitivity: 80.39% and specificity: 89.01%)( Conclusion: According to the results of the present study, both RCTS and ONSD had an acceptable diagnostic value in the prognosis of the mortality and disability level of patients with TBI.

Indexed as

Glasgow coma scaleOptic nerve sheathRotterdam CT scoreTrauma

Identifiers

PMID42891474
PMCPMC13675015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.