Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42891472›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical physics

Helium-Free Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Transforming Magnetic Resonance Imaging through Sustainable Magnet Technology.

Arnabjyoti Deva Sarma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Arnabjyoti Deva SarmaDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Allied and Healthcare Sciences, Assam Down Town University, Guwahati, Assam, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains one of the most powerful diagnostic tools in medicine; however, its dependence on liquid helium for superconducting magnet cooling poses substantial economic, environmental, and logistical challenges. The global helium shortage and rising operational costs have accelerated the pursuit of sustainable alternatives that can maintain high diagnostic performance while reducing ecological impact. A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases, covering studies published between 2018 and 2025. The analysis focused on innovations in helium-free and cryogen-minimized MRI systems, including cryocooler-based conduction cooling, high-temperature superconductors (HTS), permanent and resistive magnet technologies, and the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and digital twin frameworks for performance optimization. Findings indicate that helium-free MRI technologies deliver comparable image quality, field stability, and clinical utility to conventional systems while offering significant reductions in helium dependency, power consumption, and maintenance costs. Cryocooler and HTS-based magnets enable higher operational efficiency and reliability, while portable low-field permanent magnet systems enhance accessibility in low-resource settings. Moreover, AI-driven image reconstruction and predictive maintenance via digital twins improve workflow efficiency and sustainability. Helium-free MRI represents a paradigm shift toward sustainable and equitable medical imaging. By combining advanced magnet technologies, intelligent optimization systems, and eco-efficient design, these next-generation scanners address the global helium crisis and environmental footprint of healthcare infrastructure, redefining MRI as a cornerstone of green radiology.

Indexed as

Cryocoolercryogen-free magnetgreen radiologyhelium-free magnetic resonance imagingsustainable imaging

Identifiers

PMID42891472
PMCPMC13675052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.