Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42891471›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Tocilizumab in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Muhammad Umair Iqbal, Hassan Askari, Ira Abid, Bisma Hussain, Muhammad Hanan Abid, Aeyza Nasir

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muhammad Umair IqbalCardiology, Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Wakefield, GBR.
Hassan AskariMedicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, PAK.
Ira AbidMedicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, PAK.
Bisma HussainMedicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, PAK.
Muhammad Hanan AbidMedicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, PAK.
Aeyza NasirMedicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review synthesizes the randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence for tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor antagonist, as an adjunctive therapy in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). IL-6 is a central mediator of the inflammatory response that follows myocardial infarction and contributes to ischemia-reperfusion injury, positioning its blockade as a plausible cardioprotective strategy. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidance, we searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus for RCTs of tocilizumab administered during the acute phase of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) versus placebo or standard of care; risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. Given the substantial heterogeneity in population, dosing, and primary endpoints, findings were synthesized narratively rather than pooled. Four trials comprising 439 analyzed patients met the eligibility criteria, spanning NSTEMI and STEMI populations and both intravenous and subcutaneous dosing regimens, one of which was stopped early for futility. In the three intravenously dosed trials, tocilizumab more than halved the C-reactive protein area under the curve relative to placebo (all p < 0.001), with two trials also showing lower troponin release. One trial additionally demonstrated a significant improvement in myocardial salvage index and reduced microvascular obstruction on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI), without significant benefit on the final infarct size or six-month clinical outcomes; a separate, higher-risk trial found no significant benefit on infarct size, troponin, or neurohormonal activation despite comparable suppression of inflammation. Major adverse cardiac events did not differ significantly between arms in either trial assessing this endpoint, and the smallest, subcutaneously dosed trial raised an unreplicated cardiac tamponade signal. Two of the four trials were judged overall low risk of bias. Tocilizumab consistently attenuates the acute inflammatory response and, in one trial, improves imaging surrogates of myocardial salvage, but evidence for clinical benefit is absent, and the trial base remains too small and heterogeneous to support meta-analytic pooling or practice change. Larger, adequately powered trials with harmonized endpoints and blinded safety adjudication are needed.

Indexed as

acute coronary syndromemyocardial infarctionnon-st-segment elevation myocardial infarction (nstemi)st-segment elevation myocardial infarction (stemi)tocilizumab

Identifiers

PMID42891471
PMCPMC13675067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.