ArticleJournal of survey statistics and methodology2026
SURVEY BEHAVIOR AND COGNITION ACROSS THE LIFE COURSE: EVIDENCE FROM THE PANEL STUDY OF INCOME DYNAMICS.
Article in Journal of survey statistics and methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive abilities across adulthood are important pre-cursors to dementia. The primary way to capture cognitive abilities is via expensive and time-consuming standardized cognitive tests. We explore the extent to which cognition can be inferred from indicators of survey response behavior (SRB), such as the time to complete a questionnaire and the incidence of contradictory responses. We use nationally representative data from a mixed-mode supplement to the Panel Study of Income Dynamics collected in 2016. This Wellbeing and Daily Life supplement includes rich cognitive data capturing both verbal and quantitative reasoning, and paradata from the supplement (e.g., time to complete). We assess the ability of survey response behavior to improve prediction of cognitive ability after accounting for standard sociodemographic variables typically available in surveys. We explore this from age 30 and across the life course. We find that SRB measures provide modest but consistent explanatory power across a wide range of ages. The explanatory power of SRB measures in our data is less than that of education, except at the oldest ages. SRB measures contain useful additional information, but models that include basic demographics, education and SRB measures leave much of the variation in cognitive ability unexplained. Which SRB measures best predict cognitive ability is consistent across cognitive measure but differs by age. Errors (i.e., contradictory responses) and response times are the best predictors at working ages but skips and backups are more predictive at older ages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.