ReviewCureus2026
RAS Mutations as Prognostic Biomarkers in Digestive Cancers: From Binary Classification to Variant-Specific and Context-Dependent Risk Stratification.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In digestive cancers, activating RAS mutations - primarily KRAS, less frequently NRAS - are among the most prevalent oncogenic drivers. Their clinical significance depends strongly on the tumor type, disease stage, treatment context, and specific RAS variant. In colorectal cancer (CRC), RAS alterations are well-established predictors of resistance to anti-EGFR therapy. However, KRAS G12C-mutant tumors represent a distinct subgroup with demonstrated sensitivity to KRAS G12C inhibitors. However, growing evidence supports the negative prognostic impact of RAS mutations on both primary CRC and colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) in both post-resection and adjuvant therapies. In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), where KRAS alterations are nearly universal, prognostic evaluation has evolved from a binary mutant versus wild-type classification to a more refined approach based on mutation subtype (e.g., G12D/V vs. G12R) and KRAS mutant dosage, both of which influence clinical outcomes. In biliary tract cancers, KRAS mutations occur in a relevant subset and are consistently associated with poor survival. Liquid biopsy approaches increasingly enable noninvasive detection and longitudinal monitoring. In gastric cancer, RAS alterations are less frequent overall but may identify biologically aggressive subsets and may also be associated with inferior outcomes under HER2-targeted therapy in selected populations. This review synthesizes contemporary data supporting RAS alterations as prognostic biomarkers across digestive cancers, highlights practical considerations for integrating variant-level RAS information into risk stratification and trial designs, and discusses how emerging RAS-directed therapies may reshape the prognostic significance of specific molecular subsets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.