Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42891453›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical physics

Surface-guided Radiation Therapy in Clinical Practice: A Review with Perspectives on Implementation in Resource-constrained Settings.

Ezhil Sindhanai M Parvath, Muthiah Kasi, M Sai Pranav, Anjali Thiruthiyil, Sankar Sekar, Leel Malar, Dinesh Babu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ezhil Sindhanai M ParvathDepartment of Radiation Oncology, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Muthiah KasiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
M Sai PranavDepartment of Radiation Oncology, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Anjali ThiruthiyilDepartment of Radiation Oncology, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sankar SekarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Leel MalarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Dinesh BabuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) has emerged as a nonionizing image guidance modality that uses optical surface reconstruction for patient positioning, intra-fraction motion monitoring, and respiratory motion management. Although clinical adoption has expanded in high-income settings over the past decade, the technology remains underutilized in low- and middle-income countries where the global cancer burden is concentrated. This review synthesizes current evidence on SGRT technology, commercial platforms, clinical applications, quality assurance (QA), and workflow considerations, with emphasis on practical implementation in resource-constrained settings. The established role of SGRT in breast deep inspiration breath-hold monitoring, its emerging applications in palliative and cranial treatments, integration within hybrid image-guidance workflows, and role in online adaptive radiotherapy are discussed. Commercial platforms including AlignRT, C-RAD Catalyst/Sentinel, IDENTIFY, and the hybrid surface-thermal-X-ray ExacTrac Dynamic system are compared. QA recommendations based on American Association of Physicists in Medicine TG-302 and European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology-Advisory Committee on Radiation Oncology Practice guidelines are summarised. Under-discussed limitations, including region-of-interest selection variability, body habitus and skin pigmentation effects on surface detection (where evidence remains limited), and over-reliance on surface surrogates for deep-seated targets are critically evaluated. Emerging low-cost alternatives, particularly smartphone-based Light detection and ranging surface tracking, are discussed as a potential pathway toward more equitable surface guidance in radiation oncology.

Indexed as

Cone-beam computed tomographydeep inspiration breath-holdimage-guided radiotherapylow-and middle-income countriessurface-guided radiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID42891453
PMCPMC13675024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.