ReviewJournal of medical ultrasound
Utility of Point-of-care Ultrasound in Clinical Care: A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of medical ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has emerged as an essential bedside diagnostic tool in modern clinical practice. By enabling real-time visualization of anatomical structures and physiological processes, POCUS allows clinicians to rapidly evaluate patients and integrate imaging findings directly into clinical decision-making. This narrative review summarizes current evidence regarding the clinical utility of POCUS across both critical and noncritical care settings. Key applications include the use of structured ultrasound protocols during cardiac arrest, such as the US-CAB framework, and lung ultrasound approaches like the bedside lung ultrasound in emergency protocol for evaluating acute respiratory failure. In addition, growing evidence supports the use of POCUS in common emergency department presentations, including acute flank pain, nontraumatic abdominal pain, and undifferentiated chest pain or dyspnea. Across these clinical scenarios, POCUS has been shown to facilitate rapid diagnosis, reduce reliance on radiation-based imaging, and improve operational efficiency by shortening emergency department length of stay and expediting clinical decision-making. Despite its clinical advantages, the effective implementation of POCUS requires appropriate operator training and standardized protocols to ensure diagnostic reliability. Ongoing advances in portable ultrasound technology and image-analysis tools may further enhance the accessibility and clinical integration of POCUS in diverse healthcare environments. Overall, POCUS represents a valuable extension of bedside clinical assessment and continues to play an expanding role in modern patient-centered care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.