Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42891415›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical ultrasound

Point-of-care Ultrasound: Past, Present, and Future.

Chien-Tai Huang, Wan-Ching Lien, Cheng-Yi Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chien-Tai HuangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Wan-Ching LienDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Cheng-Yi WuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) has fundamentally transformed clinical practice from comprehensive, organ-based imaging into a rapid, goal-directed bedside tool. The development of standardized protocols - such as focused assessment with sonography for trauma, rapid ultrasound for shock and hypotension, and bedside lung ultrasound in emergency - along with real-time procedural guidance, has established PoCUS as an essential competency in critical care and emergency medicine. Currently, technological advancements have miniaturized ultrasound devices, dismantling geographical barriers and facilitating decentralized healthcare models. In the emergency department (ED), the early integration of PoCUS significantly reduces the ED length of stay and optimizes resource utilization, whereas its application continues to expand into general inpatient and community care. Looking forward, the democratization of medical education and the convergence of wireless technology with artificial intelligence will further minimize operator dependence. As its diagnostic value is firmly established, future research must pivot toward quantifying patient-centered outcomes, such as mortality and hospital readmission rates, solidifying PoCUS as an indispensable pillar of modern medicine.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceemergency department length of stayemergency medicinepoint-of-care ultrasoundportable ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID42891415
PMCPMC13674904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.