In one paragraphArticle in Indoor air, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
15 authors.
Suzanne M SimkovichDivision of Healthcare Delivery Research, MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2462-0856 Shakir HossenCenter for Global Non-Communicable Disease Research and Training, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4881-5052 Kendra N WilliamsCenter for Global Non-Communicable Disease Research and Training, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9697-048X Josiah L KephartCenter for Global Non-Communicable Disease Research and Training, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2556-4892 Magdalena Fandiño-Del-RioCenter for Global Non-Communicable Disease Research and Training, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0601-4377 Carla Tarazona-MezaCenter for Global Non-Communicable Disease Research and Training, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0623-6543 Dina GoodmanCenter for Global Non-Communicable Disease Research and Training, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Mitra MoazzamiCenter for Global Non-Communicable Disease Research and Training, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Victor G Dávila-RománCardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Kyle SteenlandDepartment of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7873-4678 Laura NicolaouCenter for Global Non-Communicable Disease Research and Training, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2539-9620 David DowdyDepartment of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0481-7475 Kirsten KoehlerDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0516-6945 William CheckleyCenter for Global Non-Communicable Disease Research and Training, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1106-8812 Cardiopulmonary Outcomes and Household Air Pollution (CHAP) Trial Investigators
Funding
MULTIDISCIPLINARY TRAINING PROGRAM IN LUNG DISEASEST32HL007534 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Nadia N Hansel, Larissa A. Shimoda · 1985 to 2026
$28.3MTraning Program in Environmental Health SciencesT32ES007141 · NIEHS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Marsha Wills-Karp · 1985 to 2026
$22.2MUJMT – ORWH – Gazzetta, Issa-BoubeD43TW009340 · FIC · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI William Checkley, Benjamin H. Chi · 2017 to 2026
$14.8MBuilding U.S. Research Capacity Through International Environmental Health Science on Air Pollution, Cardiorespiratory Disease, and Alzheimer’s Disease (Research U01)U01TW010107 · FIC · UNIVERSIDAD PERUANA CAYETANO HEREDIA · PI William Checkley, Stella Maria Hartinger · 2015 to 2026
$3.5MWashington University K12 Program in T4 Implementation ResearchK12HL137942 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DAVILA-ROMAN, VICTOR G. · 2017 to 2021
$3.1MResearch training in chronic, non-communicable respiratory diseases in PeruD43TW011502 · FIC · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CHECKLEY, WILLIAM, HARTINGER, STELLA MARIA · 2019 to 2023
$1.2MCost Effectiveness Analysis of an LPG Stove and Fuel Distribution Intervention.F32HL143909 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SIMKOVICH, SUZANNE MARIE · 2018 to 2019
$140kFIC NIH HHS D43 TW009340FIC NIH HHS D43 TW011502FIC NIH HHS U01 TW010107NCIPC CDC HHS UF2 CE002402NHLBI NIH HHS F32 HL143909NHLBI NIH HHS K12 HL137942NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007534NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007141
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Household air pollution from biomass fuel combustion affects approximately 36% of the world's population and is associated with negative health, environmental, economic, and social impacts. Although randomized controlled trials (RCTs) designed to reduce household air pollution have largely focused on health and environmental outcomes, evidence regarding their impact on quality of life (QOL) and household financial status remains limited. We conducted an RCT to evaluate the impact of a liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) intervention on health outcomes among 180 women aged 25-64 years who were the primary cooks in their households. We randomly assigned half of the participants to receive an LPG stove, continuous fuel supply for 12 months, and behavioral reinforcement. The other half continued usual cooking practices. We assessed QOL as a secondary outcome using the Short Form 36 Version 2 (SF-36-v2) and the EuroQol-5D-3L (EQ-5D). We also asked participants to report any perceived change in their household financial status 12 months after randomization. A total of 179 women (mean [±SD] age 48.3 ± 10.1 years) completed the surveys. In intention-to-treat analyses, participants in the intervention arm had similar SF-36 scores at 12 months compared with controls (mental component score: 48.3 vs. 50.9,
Identifiers
PMID42891403
PMCPMC13674693
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390