Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42891376›Full record

ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2026

Dermorexia (Cosmeticorexia): A Narrative Review of the Emerging Phenomenon of Obsessive Skincare Behavior in the Digital Age.

Mohammed Saleh Al-Dhubaibi, Ghada Farouk Mohammed, Lina Mohammed Atef, Saleh Salem Bahaj, Ahmed Mohammed Al-Dhubaibi, Nada Sameh Aziz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohammed Saleh Al-Dhubaibi
Lina Mohammed Atef
Ahmed Mohammed Al-Dhubaibi
Nada Sameh Aziz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing use of visual social media has intensified societal pressure to achieve flawless skin and may contribute to excessive preoccupation with appearance and skincare. The emerging terms dermorexia and cosmeticorexia have been used to describe potentially compulsive skincare behaviors extending beyond conventional self-care. This narrative review examines the proposed concept of dermorexia, its conceptual overlap with recognized psychiatric conditions, potential risk factors and clinical manifestations, dermatological and psychological consequences, and implications for aesthetic practice. The available literature was conducted, focusing on compulsive skincare behaviors, social media-related body image concerns, body dysmorphic disorder, and obsessive-compulsive spectrum conditions. Relevant evidence was critically synthesized to assess the current conceptual and clinical basis of dermorexia. Dermorexia has conceptual similarities to orthorexia nervosa and may overlap with obsessive-compulsive and body dysmorphic psychopathology. Adolescents and young adults may represent a particularly vulnerable population. Proposed manifestations include excessive and prolonged skincare routines, compulsive product use, repetitive mirror checking, skin picking, and recurrent pursuit of cosmetic procedures. Potential dermatological consequences include epidermal barrier disruption, irritant or allergic contact dermatitis, and excoriation-related scarring. Psychological consequences may include anxiety, depressive symptoms, appearance-related distress, and functional impairment. However, empirical validation, standardized diagnostic criteria, and prevalence estimates are currently lacking. Dermorexia/cosmeticorexia remains an unvalidated clinical construct rather than a formally recognized psychiatric diagnosis. Nevertheless, increasing awareness may help aesthetic clinicians identify maladaptive skincare and appearance-related behaviors and facilitate appropriate psychological referral. Further research is required to establish its epidemiology, diagnostic boundaries, and clinical significance. Level of Evidence: 5 (Therapeutic) For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Identifiers

PMID42891376
PMCPMC13674798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.