Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42891370›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2026

Osteosarcoma Nanomedicine: From Resistance Reversal to Bone Reconstruction.

Zhi Zheng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Zhi ZhengDepartment of Orthopedics, Chengdu Integrated TCM & Western Medicine Hospital, Chengdu, 610095, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-4110-2938

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical management of Osteosarcoma (OS) is primarily hindered by two major challenges: intractable multidrug resistance and the reconstruction of critical-sized post-surgical bone defects. Nanomedicine provides a promising paradigm to overcome these clinical limitations. Synthesizing over 100 pivotal studies published predominantly between 2021 and 2026, this review moves beyond treating OS nanotherapy and bone tissue engineering as independent fields, conceptualizing them instead as a contiguous clinical pipeline. We map the trajectory of nanoscale interventions based on OS-specific biological barriers: progressing from systemic targeted nanotherapies designed to dismantle multidrug resistance and metabolic vulnerabilities (eg, ferroptosis, cuproptosis), to the localized management of the post-resection defect. Concurrently, we highlight the evolution of skeletal reconstruction through 3D-printed, stimuli-responsive biomimetic scaffolds. These smart implants exploit the unique OS microenvironment to precisely synchronize the eradication of residual microscopic disease with osteoinductive tissue regeneration. However, unpredictable in vivo degradation and chronic toxicity remain critical translational bottlenecks. Future breakthroughs demand artificial intelligence-guided predictive design and a paradigm shift from pure cytotoxicity toward immunomodulatory architectures that facilitate host-driven tumor clearance and bone regeneration.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsNanomedicineOsteosarcomaAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBone RegenerationDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansPrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsTumor MicroenvironmentAntineoplastic Agentsmultidrug resistancenanomedicineosteosarcomastimuli-responsive scaffoldstumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID42891370
PMCPMC13674568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.