ArticleBreast cancer (Dove Medical Press)2026
Potential Molecular Links Between Benzophenone-3 and Breast Cancer: Network Toxicology, Machine Learning, Molecular Modeling, and Gene Expression Validation.
Article in Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Benzophenone-3 (BP-3) is a widely used ultraviolet filter with potential carcinogenic concern, but its molecular link with breast cancer remains unclear. This study aimed to identify candidate targets and potential molecular links between BP-3 and breast cancer using toxicological prediction, machine learning, molecular modeling, and gene expression analysis. Methods: The ADMET and toxicity profiles of BP-3 were evaluated using PubChem, ADMETlab 3.0, ProTox 3.0, and pkCSM. BP-3-related targets were predicted from ChEMBL, STITCH, and SwissTargetPrediction, while breast cancer-related differentially expressed genes were obtained from GEO datasets. Candidate targets were screened by intersection analysis and examined using GO/KEGG enrichment and PPI networks. Core genes were identified using 127 machine learning model combinations and SHAP interpretation. GSVA, GSEA, TIMER2.0, molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations, MM-GBSA calculations, and qRT-PCR were used for validation. Results: Seventy BP-3-associated candidate genes related to breast cancer were identified. Among 127 model combinations, Stepglm[both]+SVM showed the best performance, with an average AUC of 0.935, and identified MMP13, ERBB2, and HMGCR as core genes. Functional analyses suggested that these genes were mainly involved in extracellular matrix remodeling, lipid metabolism reprogramming, and energy metabolism regulation. Molecular docking predicted favorable binding poses between BP-3 and the candidate proteins, with docking scores ranging from -5.8 to -8.5 kcal/mol. Molecular dynamics and MM-GBSA analyses indicated stable simulated complexes, with calculated binding free energies below -14.30 kcal/mol. qRT-PCR showed higher expression of MMP13, ERBB2, and HMGCR in the examined breast cancer cell lines than in normal mammary epithelial cells. Conclusion: Integrated computational analyses identified MMP13, ERBB2, and HMGCR as candidate genes potentially linking BP-3 with breast cancer-related molecular features. Molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations predicted feasible interactions between BP-3 and the corresponding proteins, while qRT-PCR confirmed the differential expression of these genes in breast cancer cell lines. These findings represent computational predictions and correlational evidence rather than proof of direct BP-3 regulation or causation. Direct BP-3 exposure experiments in cellular and animal models are required to establish causal relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.