ReviewiMetaOmics2026
Microbiome-mediated plant-soil feedbacks as a tool for resilient agriculture.
Review in iMetaOmics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional agricultural intensification has eroded the biological foundations of productive soil by disrupting the reciprocal interactions, plant-soil feedback (PSF), through which plants actively shape and are continuously shaped by the soil microbiome. Although the molecular mechanisms governing PSF direction are increasingly well-characterized, deliberate PSF management as a practical tool for resilient crop production remains underdeveloped. This is largely because no integrative framework has translated these ecological insights into state-contingent, field-deployable decision rules. This review addresses that gap by first synthesizing the molecular basis of microbiome assembly, encompassing host genetic control of root exudate chemistry, receptor-mediated microbial recognition, and the bidirectional chemical dialogue between plant and rhizosphere. Building from this mechanistic foundation, we move beyond cataloging mechanisms to present a novel, integrative three-pillar management framework for actively steering PSF. This framework operationalizes PSF management by strategically combining: (i) engineering the plant partner (leveraging genetics to recruit beneficial microbiomes), (ii) managing the soil habitat (using agronomic practices to engineer suppressive ecological legacies), and (iii) deploying advanced microbial consortia. Critically, we argue that the recent meta-omics revolution, integrating metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, metaproteomics, and metabolomics, is the enabling technology that transforms this framework from a conceptual model into a quantifiable, diagnosable, and agriculturally deployable system. Multi-omics tools provide the empirical foundation for diagnosing soil feedback states, monitoring intervention outcomes, and building predictive models. By bridging the lab-field gap and evaluating key translational challenges, this review provides a coherent, actionable roadmap for harnessing PSF to achieve cultivated resilience in modern agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.