Trial reportJTCVS techniques2026
Extended reality-assisted localization of lung nodules in a hybrid operating room: A prospective study.
Trial report in JTCVS techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, accuracy, and safety of a novel extended reality-assisted percutaneous localization technique in a hybrid operating room for patients with small pulmonary nodules. Methods: In this prospective, single-arm study, 20 adult patients scheduled for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery sublobar resection for peripheral pulmonary nodules (2 cm or less) were enrolled. Participants underwent extended reality-guided percutaneous dye localization under general anesthesia. Patient-specific 3-dimensional holographic models were registered using optical markers to guide needle insertion, followed by confirmatory cone-beam computed tomography. The primary outcomes were technical accuracy and procedural safety. Results: The extended reality-assisted technique achieved a 90% technical success rate. The mean localization error was 7.9 mm in the intention-to-treat population. The procedure was efficient, with a median localization time of 13.5 minutes and a median of 1 confirmatory cone-beam computed tomography scan. The complication rate was 5%, involving a single case of pneumothorax; no intrapulmonary hemorrhage or air embolism occurred. Conclusions: Extended reality-assisted percutaneous localization in a hybrid operating room is feasible and safe, demonstrating acceptable accuracy for small pulmonary nodules. This approach may streamline surgical workflow by enabling continuous needle advancement and reducing repetitive interruptions compared with conventional cone-beam computed tomography guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.