ArticleNpj gut and liver2025
Automated digital analysis of propagated contractions recorded during fasting using high resolution small intestinal manometry in healthy participants.
Article in Npj gut and liver, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Manometry, the gold standard for evaluating phasic contractions in the alimentary tract, relies heavily on qualitative pattern recognition, despite generating large volumes of data. Our aim was to develop an automated detection tool that can quantify fundamental manometric events in high-resolution small bowel manometry tracings by assessing their parameters. Digitally identified propagated contractile events (PCEs) are compared to manual analysis; the system achieved 86% accuracy and 91% precision. Utilizing this automated system, we analyzed approximately 30 h of manometry recordings gathered from 10 healthy subjects. The velocity of fully propagated PCEs is significantly faster, and there was a significant decrease in the frequency of the PCEs following phase III activity. We conclude that computer vision-based automated evaluation of PCEs may improve our understanding of fasting intestinal motility in both health and disease.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.