Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42891215›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied physics2023

Dielectric constant measurement sensitivity in electrostatic force and force gradient microscopy-based modes.

Gheorghe Stan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gheorghe StanMaterial Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5773-0328

Funding

Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the nanoscale electrostatic interaction between a conductive atomic force microscopy (AFM) probe and a dielectric film is central to the operation of various nanoscale dielectric microscopies and determination of dielectric properties of the film. There is no simple analytical description of the electrostatic interaction generated in the confined probe-sample geometry for neither the static nor dynamic AFM modes used in dielectric measurements. An accurate description of the involved physics is obtained only by means of a finite element analysis modeling of the system. However, the alternative to using numerical analysis is not very popular due to being slower and requiring relatively high computation resources. In this work we revised the contributions from different parts of the AFM probe to the probe-sample capacitance by both analytical and numerical methods. We tried to reconciliate the two approaches and observed the differences as a function of geometry and material parameters. Under various noise levels, the efficiency of an analytical model was tested against finite element analysis that captures in detail the electrostatic interaction in AFM-based dielectric measurements. The investigation was performed in both spectroscopic force-distance curves and constant height scans with measurements for the deflection and frequency of the AFM probe. The obtained measurement sensitivities are relevant in selecting the optimal scanning mode and its operational parameters for a given film thicknesses and dielectric constants but also show the critical role of numerical analysis to the correct interpretation of the measurements.

Indexed as

electrostatic force microscopyfinite element analysisnanoscale dielectric measurements

Identifiers

PMID42891215
PMCPMC13673838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.