Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42891179›Full record

ArticleInnovation (Cambridge (Mass.))2026

Deciphering interventional dynamical causality from non-intervention complex systems.

Jifan Shi, Yang Li, Juan Zhao, Siyang Leng, Rui Bao, Kazuyuki Aihara, Luonan Chen, Wei Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jifan ShiResearch Institute of Intelligent Complex Systems & CISOR, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Yang LiInternational Research Center for Neurointelligence, The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Juan ZhaoSchool of Pharmacy, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China.
Siyang LengResearch Institute of Intelligent Complex Systems & CISOR, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Rui BaoFrontiers Science Center for Deep Ocean Multispheres and Earth System, Key Laboratory of Marine Chemistry Theory and Technology, and Innovation Center for Ocean Carbon Neutrality, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China.
Kazuyuki AiharaInternational Research Center for Neurointelligence, The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Luonan ChenSchool of Mathematical Sciences and School of AI, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.
Wei LinResearch Institute of Intelligent Complex Systems & CISOR, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detecting and quantifying causal influence is a focal topic in the fields of science, engineering, and interdisciplinary studies. However, causal studies on non-intervention systems attract much attention but remain extremely challenging. The delay-embedding technique provides a promising approach. In this study, we propose a framework named interventional dynamical causality (IntDC) in contrast to the traditional constructive dynamical causality (ConDC). ConDC, including Granger causality, transfer entropy, and convergence of cross-mapping, measures the causality by constructing a dynamical model without considering interventions. A computational criterion, interventional embedding entropy (IEE), is proposed to measure causal strengths in an interventional manner. IEE is an intervened causal information flow but in the delay-embedding space. Further, the IEE theoretically and numerically enables the deciphering of IntDC solely from observational (non-interventional) time-series data, without requiring any knowledge of dynamical models or real interventions in the considered system. In particular, IEE can be applied to rank causal effects according to their importance and construct causal networks from data. We conducted numerical experiments on logistic dynamics, coupled-Hénon maps, and chaotic neural networks to demonstrate that IEE can find causal edges accurately, eliminate effects of confounding, and quantify causal strength robustly over traditional indices. We also applied IEE to real-world tasks, including estimating neural connectomes of

Indexed as

causal influencedelay embeddingdynamical systemsinterventional embedding entropynetwork reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID42891179
PMCPMC13673554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.