Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42891164›Full record

ArticleBJUI compass2026

Decision regret after partial nephrectomy for benign small renal masses: The importance of preoperative counselling.

Sarika Nalagatla, Aqua Asif, Bhargab Ghoshal, Maria Yacoub, Samuel Davis, Maria Bahhadi-Harbo, Abhishek Reekhaye, Manar Malki, Muddassar Hussain, Neil Barber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJUI compass, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sarika NalagatlaDepartment of Urology Frimley Park Hospital, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust Surrey UK.
Aqua AsifDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science University College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3233-7428
Bhargab GhoshalUniversity College London Medical School London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9539-3117
Maria YacoubDepartment of Urology Frimley Park Hospital, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust Surrey UK.
Samuel DavisDepartment of Urology Frimley Park Hospital, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust Surrey UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6068-4788
Maria Bahhadi-HarboHistopathology Department Frimley Park Hospital, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust Surrey UK.
Abhishek ReekhayeDepartment of Urology Frimley Park Hospital, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust Surrey UK.
Manar MalkiDepartment of Urology Frimley Park Hospital, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust Surrey UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8971-2845
Muddassar HussainDepartment of Urology Frimley Park Hospital, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust Surrey UK.
Neil BarberDepartment of Urology Frimley Park Hospital, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust Surrey UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate decision regret following robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) for benign small renal masses (SRMs) in patients who did not undergo preoperative renal mass biopsy (RMB) and to assess factors associated with regret and satisfaction with treatment decision-making. Patients and Methods: We conducted a mixed methods study combining retrospective clinical data with prospective patient-reported outcomes at a high-volume renal cancer centre. Patients who underwent RALPN for indeterminate SRMs ≤4 cm between January 2010 and July 2025 without preoperative RMB and were subsequently found to have benign histology were identified from a prospectively maintained renal cancer database. Participants completed a standardised questionnaire incorporating the validated Decision Regret Scale (DRS). Significant regret was defined as DRS ≥ 25. Decision regret was evaluated in relation to patients' recollection of counselling and perceived quality of preoperative information. Results: Of 1480 RALPN procedures performed during the study period, 167 patients met the eligibility criteria. Contact was established with 108 patients, of whom 104 agreed to participate and 58 completed the questionnaire. Median age was 66 years, and median tumour size was 30 mm. No Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥III complications occurred. Most patients recalled being informed that the lesion could be benign (79.3%). Discussion of RMB was recalled by 55.2% of respondents, whereas 29.3% reported no recollection of biopsy discussion. Overall decision regret was low, with a mean DRS of 13.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.3-17.4), although 27.6% demonstrated clinically significant regret (DRS ≥ 25). Despite benign histology, 87.9% believed surgery had been the correct decision and only 29.3% would retrospectively have preferred RMB before surgery. Lower regret scores were observed in patients who recalled detailed RMB discussion and reported higher perceived quality of preoperative counselling. Conclusion: Most patients undergoing RALPN for benign small renal masses reported low decision regret despite ultimately benign pathology. Although over one-quarter of patients demonstrated clinically significant regret, the majority remained satisfied with their treatment decision and believed surgery had been the correct choice. Comprehensive counselling regarding diagnostic uncertainty and the potential role of renal mass biopsy may help minimise subsequent regret, reinforcing the importance of shared decision-making in contemporary small renal mass management.

Indexed as

benign renal tumourdecision regretpartial nephrectomypatient‐reported outcomespreoperative counsellingrenal mass biopsyshared decision‐makingsmall renal mass

Identifiers

PMID42891164
PMCPMC13673402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.