ReviewExtracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids2026
Artificial intelligence for extracellular vesicle engineering and therapeutic design.
Review in Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are promising platforms for next-generation drug delivery and regenerative therapeutics, yet biological heterogeneity, limited targeting specificity, variable cargo composition, and continued reliance on empirical optimization hinder clinical translation. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers new opportunities to make EV engineering more predictive and data-driven. Building on prior work in AI-assisted EV delivery and emerging virtual-EV modeling, this review presents an evidence-aware, multiscale framework that integrates parental-cell programming, vesicle design, recipient-system modeling, and experimental feedback. At the source level, AI virtual cells (AIVCs) may help predict how perturbations to parental cells influence EV biogenesis and composition. At the vesicle level, AI-guided approaches may support cargo prioritization, surface engineering, and loading optimization. At the recipient level, digital twin models could help simulate EV uptake, intracellular trafficking, microenvironmental interactions, and downstream therapeutic responses. These components may ultimately be integrated with experimental validation into iterative design-test-refinement workflows. Importantly, this review distinguishes direct EV-specific evidence from technologies transferable from adjacent fields and concepts that remain prospective. By defining these evidence boundaries and linking them to key challenges in data quality, model interpretability, manufacturing, and validation, this framework provides a practical roadmap for advancing AI-enabled EV therapeutics from conceptual modeling to testable, translationally relevant engineering strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.