Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42891151›Full record

ArticleNanophotonics (Berlin, Germany)2026

Neural Adjoint Inverse Design of Three-Dimensional Nanophotonic Devices.

Chanik Kang, Hyewon Suk, Ikbeom Jang, Haejun Chung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chanik KangDepartment of Artificial Intelligence Hanyang University Seoul Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4592-7629
Hyewon SukDepartment of Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Engineering Hanyang University Seoul Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5287-3047
Ikbeom JangDepartment of Computer Engineering Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Yongin Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6901-983X
Haejun ChungDepartment of Artificial Intelligence Hanyang University Seoul Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8959-237X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Volumetric meta-optics have emerged as a compact high-performance platform for advanced imaging, color routing in image sensors, and on-chip wavefront control. Realizing such devices depends on solving a high-dimensional nonconvex inverse-design problem governed by Maxwell's equations. Adjoint optimization is the standard route to gradients, yet broadband three-dimensional (3D) design typically requires thousands of full-wave forward/adjoint simulations, making industrial-scale optimization prohibitively slow. To address this bottleneck, a neural adjoint method is introduced, in which a solver-supervised Fourier neural operator (FNO) directly predicts dense, per-voxel 3D adjoint gradient fields from a voxelized permittivity volume. To preserve the sharp, resonance-driven sensitivity peaks that single-pass operator networks tend to oversmooth, a stage-wise FNO is proposed, in which successive stages refine residual errors with progressively higher-frequency emphasis. A domain-specific dataset is curated from paired forward/adjoint finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulations spanning three volumetric tasks: spectral sorting (color routers), achromatic focusing (metalenses), and waveguide mode conversion. Across all benchmarks, the surrogate-driven optimization attains figures of merit within 86%-99% of rigorous FDTD-based adjoint optimization whilst reducing end-to-end design time from hours to seconds, with speedups exceeding

Indexed as

adjoint methodfourier neural operatorinverse designmeta‐opticsscientific machine learningsurrogate modeling

Identifiers

PMID42891151
PMCPMC13673514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.