ArticleAnnals of intensive care2026
National variation in acute kidney injury diagnosis and monitoring across adult intensive care units in china: a nationwide cross-sectional survey.
Article in Annals of intensive care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in critically ill patients and strongly associated with adverse outcomes, yet national ICU-level evidence on AKI diagnosis and monitoring in China remains limited. Methods: We conducted a nationwide anonymous cross-sectional web survey of adult ICUs in China from June 25 to September 26, 2025. The survey assessed AKI diagnosis and staging, UO and SCr monitoring across clinical scenarios, biomarker use, early warning systems, and changes in UO monitoring after AKI. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with UO-monitoring practices, with FDR correction for multiple comparisons. An exploratory 0-100-point AKI-MIS summarised ICU-level monitoring implementation, with higher scores indicating broader implementation. Results: Of 2,002 responses, 1,896 unique adult ICU units were included. AKI diagnosis was reported by 97.9% of ICUs, whereas 63.2% explicitly implemented staging and 75.9% used both UO and SCr for diagnosis. Hourly UO monitoring increased from 49.6% in routine practice to 74.1% in sepsis, 75.0% in AKI, and 77.7% in sepsis-associated AKI. Dynamic UO monitoring was implemented in 14.8% of ICUs; 83.5% reported increased nursing workload, and 69.9% identified workload or insufficient staffing as the main barrier. After FDR correction, geographic region, nurse-to-bed ratio, and baseline monitoring intensity were associated with UO-monitoring practices. The median AKI-MIS was 68.1 (IQR, 60.3-74.9), with higher adjusted scores in teaching hospitals. Conclusions: Among participating adult ICU units across all 31 provincial-level administrative regions of mainland China, AKI diagnosis and monitoring were widely reported, but substantial heterogeneity remained across monitoring systems. These findings provide a broad descriptive benchmark and identify priorities for strengthening standardisation, risk-responsive escalation, and closed-loop response pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.