ReviewExtracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids2026
Therapeutic extracellular vesicles isolated from mesenchymal stem cells: properties, isolation, characterization, and applications in optic neuropathies.
Review in Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are promising cell-free therapeutic agents because of their low immunogenicity, excellent biocompatibility, and intrinsic capacity for intercellular communication. Of these, mesenchymal stem cell-derived EVs (MSC-EVs) have attracted considerable interest for their potential in treating optic neuropathies; however, their clinical translation remains limited by standardized manufacturing, quality evaluation, and mechanistic understanding. This review summarizes key advances in therapeutic EV development, including MSC culture, EV production, isolation, and characterization, with a focus on the current strategies and limitations of EV quality assessment. In addition, we propose a pathological-node-based framework to integrate the current evidence for EV therapies with optic neuropathies. Despite differences in EV sources, molecular composition, and proposed mechanisms, the therapeutic effects of diverse EV preparations converge on three shared pathological processes: retinal ganglion cell (RGC) preservation, neuroinflammatory regulation, and metabolic homeostasis maintenance. Finally, we discuss major challenges for clinical translation, including EV heterogeneity, functional EV subpopulations, targeted delivery, engineering strategies, and the establishment of biologically relevant potency assays. This review highlights the need to shift EV studies from empirical preparation toward mechanism-driven design and functional evaluation, thereby facilitating the development of clinically translatable EV-based therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.