ReviewExtracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids2026
Extracellular vesicles for Alzheimer's disease therapy: mechanisms, engineering strategies, and clinical translation.
Review in Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD), a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, remains a major global health challenge owing to its complex pathogenesis and the presence of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which substantially limits the delivery of effective therapeutics to the brain. Extracellular vesicles (EVs), which exhibit favorable biocompatibility, low immunogenicity, and the potential to cross or bypass the BBB under specific conditions, have emerged as promising therapeutic agents and delivery platforms for AD. This review focuses on the therapeutic potential of EV-based interventions in AD and summarizes recent advances in EV-mediated modulation of AD-related pathological processes, including amyloid-β (Aβ) clearance, tau protein regulation, neuroinflammation suppression, oxidative stress attenuation, and synaptic repair. Although EV-based therapies offer notable advantages, such as targeted BBB penetration and reduced immunogenic responses, their clinical translation remains constrained by safety concerns, including off-target effects, dose-dependent toxicity, and potential disturbances in neuroplasticity. In addition, this review discusses EV engineering strategies aimed at regulating the gut-brain axis (GBA), enhancing brain targeting, and advancing clinical translation. EV-based therapeutic interventions should therefore be developed within a safety-oriented framework supported by rigorous short- and long-term toxicological evaluation. Overall, this review highlights the therapeutic promise of EVs for AD while underscoring the need for rational engineering, standardized characterization, and safety-centered translational strategies to ensure clinical feasibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.