Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42891085›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2026

Emotional reactivity and decision-making under social deprivation: the role of trait anxiety during quarantine.

Avisha, Akhilesh Tayade, Arjun Ramakrishnan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

AvishaDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Akhilesh TayadeDepartment of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4032-3889
Arjun RamakrishnanDepartment of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social isolation measures enforced during the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of the social environment in shaping affective states and decision-making. However, the day-to-day experience and psychological recovery from social deprivation, especially among individuals with high trait anxiety, remains poorly understood. We conducted a 10-day longitudinal study with 116 university students returning to campus, collecting approximately 31 000 momentary assessments of affect and social interactions during a 3-day quarantine and subsequent period. Quarantine increased the need for social interaction and altered patterns of social engagement, whereas trait anxiety was robustly associated with reduced positive affect and elevated negative affect. Close interactions following quarantine were associated with higher positive affect. We also administered a virtual patch-foraging task to participants during and after quarantine. Greater variability in negative affect was associated with lower patch exit thresholds, suggesting a tendency to persist in depleted patches. These findings highlight how trait anxiety shapes emotional experience and social behaviour in daily life and reveal how fluctuations in negative affect can influence sequential decision-making under uncertainty.

Indexed as

affectCOVID-19decision-makingEMAgeneralized linear mixed modelsquarantinesocial interactions

Identifiers

PMID42891085
PMCPMC13673250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.