ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2026
Impact of a multifaceted intervention programme on antibiotic prescribing in out-of-hours primary care in five European countries: secondary analyses of the HAPPY PATIENT project.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Antimicrobial resistance is a major global health threat, driven mainly by excessive and inappropriate antibiotic use. As most antibiotics are prescribed outside hospitals, primary care measures are crucial for reducing use. The study aimed to investigate diagnostic coding and antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract (RTI) and urinary tract (UTI) infections treated in out-of-hours clinics before and after a multifaceted intervention. Methods: Audit and feedback with analyses of prescription data from five out-of-hours clinics in Europe before and after a multifaceted intervention. The intervention consisted of an audit with reports and feedback to the prescriber, participation in workshops, communication and e-learning courses, and distribution of information materials to patients. Results: A total of 67 physicians recorded 1786 cases in the first period and 1820 in the second. Common cold/influenza was the most frequent diagnosis, increasing from 19.4% (95% CI 18-21) in the first to 28.7% (95% CI 27-31) in the second period. COVID-19 declined by 65.7% ( Conclusions: The study provided important insights into which RTIs are potentially inappropriately treated with antibiotics, although the intervention did not produce a statistically significant reduction in antibiotic prescribing. Positively, the use of first-line antibiotics for UTIs increased significantly.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.