Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42891077›Full record

ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2026

Impact of a multifaceted intervention programme on antibiotic prescribing in out-of-hours primary care in five European countries: secondary analyses of the HAPPY PATIENT project.

Ingrid Keilegavlen Rebnord, Carl Llor, Fabiana Raynal Floriano, Malene Plejdrup Hansen, Jesper Lykkegaard, Jonas Olsen, Pia Touboul-Lundgren, Pascale Bruno, Anna Kowalczyk, Christos Lionis and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ingrid Keilegavlen RebnordDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1975-7404
Carl LlorUniversity Institute in Primary Care Research Jordi Gol, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6644-717X
Fabiana Raynal FlorianoQuantitative Methods for Economics and Management, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Malene Plejdrup HansenDepartment of Public Health, Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Jesper LykkegaardDepartment of Public Health, Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Jonas OlsenDepartment of Public Health, Research Unit for General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Pia Touboul-LundgrenDepartment of Public Health, Nice University Hospital, Nice, France.
Pascale BrunoDepartment of Public Health, Nice University Hospital, Nice, France.
Anna KowalczykCentre for Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Christos LionisClinic of Social and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.
Ruta RadzevicieneLtd Mano Seimos Gydytojas (My Family Doctor), Klapeida, Lithuania.
Lina JarusevicieneDepartment of Family Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Lars BjerrumSection of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0969-0063
Ana Garcia-SangenisUniversity Institute in Primary Care Research Jordi Gol, Barcelona, Spain.
Bent Håkan LindbergNORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance is a major global health threat, driven mainly by excessive and inappropriate antibiotic use. As most antibiotics are prescribed outside hospitals, primary care measures are crucial for reducing use. The study aimed to investigate diagnostic coding and antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract (RTI) and urinary tract (UTI) infections treated in out-of-hours clinics before and after a multifaceted intervention. Methods: Audit and feedback with analyses of prescription data from five out-of-hours clinics in Europe before and after a multifaceted intervention. The intervention consisted of an audit with reports and feedback to the prescriber, participation in workshops, communication and e-learning courses, and distribution of information materials to patients. Results: A total of 67 physicians recorded 1786 cases in the first period and 1820 in the second. Common cold/influenza was the most frequent diagnosis, increasing from 19.4% (95% CI 18-21) in the first to 28.7% (95% CI 27-31) in the second period. COVID-19 declined by 65.7% ( Conclusions: The study provided important insights into which RTIs are potentially inappropriately treated with antibiotics, although the intervention did not produce a statistically significant reduction in antibiotic prescribing. Positively, the use of first-line antibiotics for UTIs increased significantly.

Identifiers

PMID42891077
PMCPMC13673263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.