ArticleRSC advances2026
Single-step Raman spectroscopy for maple syrup quality control.
Article in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Maple syrup quality evaluation involves multiple parameters, including color classification, flavor assessment, and the measurement of sugar concentration, which are influenced by the complex chemical composition of the syrup matrix. Conventional quality assessment relies on separate analytical and sensory approaches, creating a bottleneck in the industrial processing of maple syrup. As such, rapid techniques are needed to assess multiple quality control parameters from a single measurement. In this study, Raman spectroscopy combined with machine learning was evaluated to characterize maple syrup quality attributes using 721 samples representing different color grades (golden, amber, dark, and very dark) and flavor categories. After spectral preprocessing, principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to investigate natural spectral variations among samples. PCA revealed differences associated with syrup color and flavor categories; however, the overlap observed among several groups indicated that the relationship between Raman fingerprints and maple syrup properties involves complex spectral variations that are not fully resolved by linear unsupervised analysis. To improve discrimination, convolutional neural network (CNN) models were developed to extract nonlinear spectral features directly from Raman data. For color classification, the CNN achieved prediction accuracies of 91%, 68%, 73%, and 92% for golden, amber, dark, and very dark syrups, respectively. Flavor classification showed strong discrimination for several defect categories, including OK (83%), √ (76%), VR4 (73%), VR5 (78%), VR13 (100%), and CT (83%), while lower performance for VR1 (55%), VR2 (66%), and VR12 (64%) reflected the challenge of differentiating sensory defects with overlapping chemical characteristics. VR13 showed a high classification rate in the evaluated data; however, the small number of independent VR13 samples prevents a robust estimate of general performance for this class. In addition to Raman fingerprints, fluorescence background variations were evaluated as an indicator of optical properties and were found to correlate with maple syrup light transmittance values used for color grading. The quantitative capability of Raman spectroscopy was further assessed by predicting sucrose concentrations using standard sucrose solutions (45-67%, w/w). Concentration-dependent Raman features were extracted and used to develop a random forest regression (RFR) model, achieving coefficients of determination (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.