Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42890917›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical physics

A Simulation Study of Carbon Dot-Assisted Photothermal Heating in Tumor Tissue.

M Anne Jose, Bindu Krishnan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M Anne JoseDepartment of Physics, Sree Kerala Varma College, Thrissur, Affiliated to the University of Calicut, Thrissur, Kerala, India.
Bindu KrishnanDepartment of Physics, Sree Kerala Varma College, Thrissur, Affiliated to the University of Calicut, Thrissur, Kerala, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to investigate photothermal heating and thermal damage in breast tumor tissue under laser irradiation in the presence of carbon dots acting as enhanced optical absorbers. Methods: A two-dimensional numerical model based on the transient bioheat transfer equation was developed by coupling radiative heat transfer and solved using the finite element method in COMSOL Multiphysics. The tumor region was modeled as a circular domain embedded within normal breast tissue. Thermal damage was quantified using the cumulative equivalent minutes at 43°C (CEM43) model. Parametric analysis was carried out to evaluate the effects of tumor absorption coefficient, carbon dot absorption coefficient, photothermal conversion efficiency, blood perfusion rate, and tumor depth on temperature evolution. Results: Localized heating was observed within the tumor region, with peak temperatures reaching approximately 60°C after 600s of irradiation. Temperature elevation increased with increasing optical absorption and irradiation duration, whereas blood perfusion reduced thermal accumulation. Thermal damage analysis indicated that the irreversible damage threshold (CEM43 >60 min) was achieved throughout the tumor region after 600s of irradiation, suggesting effective thermal destruction of tumor tissue, while damage to surrounding healthy tissue remained limited. Conclusions: The model demonstrates that carbon dots can effectively enhance photothermal heating in tumor tissue and achieve thermal damage. The findings provide a computational framework for optimizing laser-based tumor therapy while maintaining thermal safety.

Indexed as

Bioheat transfercarbon dotscumulative equivalent minutes at 43°CP1 approximationphotothermal therapythermal damage

Identifiers

PMID42890917
PMCPMC13675014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.