ArticleFrontiers in genetics2026
Clinical and genetic features, surgical management, and longitudinal follow-up in two children with progressive osseous heteroplasia.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Progressive osseous heteroplasia (POH) is an ultrarare disorder characterized by heterotopic ossification that progresses from the skin and subcutaneous tissues into deeper connective tissues. Most affected individuals harbor heterozygous inactivating variants in Methods: We retrospectively characterized two children with clinically diagnosed POH who underwent genetic testing and surgical treatment. Whole-exome sequencing was performed on peripheral blood and, when available, resected tissue, followed by PCR-Sanger sequencing and T-vector cloning. Case 1 underwent clinical and radiographic follow-up for 5 years; follow-up for Case 2 was limited to family-provided radiographs obtained at 2 years. Results: Case 1 harbored a possible postzygotic mosaic Conclusion: These cases provide additional clinical, molecular, and longitudinal information on POH and illustrate the importance of lesion distribution and resectability when interpreting surgical outcomes. The available postoperative findings cannot establish a causal relationship between variant status and prognosis because the patients differed in baseline disease extent, completeness of excision, follow-up duration, and outcome ascertainment. A possible association between mosaic burden and lesion distribution remains a hypothesis that requires evaluation in larger cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.