ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Lung cancer screening health beliefs among a high-risk population in China: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Evidence on lung cancer screening (LCS) health beliefs among high-risk populations in China remains limited. This study aimed to examine LCS health beliefs and associated factors among individuals at high risk for lung cancer in Fujian Province, China. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from September 2020 to October 2022. High-risk individuals were recruited using a four-stage multistage sampling procedure incorporating probability-proportionate-to-size sampling. LCS health beliefs were assessed using the Chinese Lung Cancer Screening Health Belief Scale (LCSHB-C). Multiple linear regression was used to examine associated factors. Results: A total of 1,957 participants were included, with a mean overall LCSHB-C score of 95.10 (SD = 10.13). LCS-related knowledge and previous screening experience showed the most consistent positive associations with health beliefs. Rural residence, religious affiliation, and higher household income were also associated with higher overall scores, whereas female sex, current or former smoking, COPD, and participation in the national basic medical insurance program were associated with lower scores. Associations with age, education, body mass index, and occupational exposure varied across health belief domains. Conclusion: LCS health beliefs were associated with screening knowledge, previous screening experience, and several sociodemographic and health-related characteristics. These findings may inform tailored LCS education and support strategies to facilitate informed participation among high-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.