Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42890824›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on medical education2026

Beyond Qualification: A Video-Stimulated Interview Study on What Group Discussion of Audit and Feedback Adds to Professional Development in General Practice.

Dorien van der Winden, Mana Nasori, Marianne Mak-van der Vossen, Nynke van Dijk, Marije van Braak, Jettie Bont, Mechteld Visser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dorien van der WindenPhD student, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of General Practice, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, also affiliated with Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5256-6095
Mana NasoriResearch assistant, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of General Practice, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, also affiliated with Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8559-1791
Marianne Mak-van der VossenAssociate professor, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of General Practice, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, also affiliated with Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7810-6575
Nynke van DijkProfessor in Medical Education, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of General Practice, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7959-5649
Marije van BraakAssistant professor at the Department of Language, Literature and Communication, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2938-1508
Jettie BontProfessor in General Practice, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of General Practice, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, also affiliated with Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5358-0235
Mechteld VisserSenior researcher at Amsterdam UMC, Department of General Practice location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, also affiliated with Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7890-9332

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Modern healthcare demands continuing professional development (CPD) that bridges learning and practice and motivates health professionals. Current CPD activities often prioritize qualification, while socialization and subjectification purposes are considered vital in other educational contexts and could help to foster dynamic learning. Group discussion of audit and feedback (A&F) is a form of CPD that is used increasingly, and that may fulfill these needs. However, little is known about how this approach creates learning opportunities or what the group dynamic contributes. Method: In this video-stimulated interview study we explored how a group of experienced general practitioners perceive the value of group discussion of A&F in their professional development, employing a constructivist paradigm. We first inductively analyzed our findings, using Thematic Analysis. A second deductive analysis followed, using Biesta's concept of the three purposes of education (qualification, socialization and subjectification) as framework. Results: According to our participants, group discussion of A&F allows for a reflective process that adds to their professional development. The group helps deepen reflection and assists with the forming of individual and collective opinions. The meetings enhanced motivation for both individual and collective learning. Key conditions included a safe learning environment and a high level of enjoyability. The group meetings offered opportunities for all three purposes of education. Discussion: Group discussion adds value to individual A&F by offering room for socialization and subjectification, as well as classic qualification purposes. It thereby offers a future proof form of CPD that could improve quality of healthcare and stimulate lifelong learning.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, ContinuingFeedbackGeneral PracticeStaff DevelopmentGroup DynamicsHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchVideo Recording

Identifiers

PMID42890824
PMCPMC13674528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.