ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
"I swear it's not Tourette's!" - it is time to rethink coprolalia in Tourette syndrome.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coprolalia is a relatively rare type of complex vocal tic in people with Tourette syndrome (TS). In the general population, however, it is believed that coprolalia is the most typical and common symptom resulting in the stereotype of TS as the "swearing disease". Swearing, however, also occurs as a "normal" expression of negative emotions and thus occurs more often in people with impulse control problems. It is believed that there is a continuum reaching from voluntary to involuntary swearing. Besides coprolalia, in TS, coprophenomena may also occur in the form of motor tics, called copropraxia. Furthermore, other socially inappropriate behaviors have been described such as making socially inappropriate comments and actions, called Non Obscene Socially Inappropriate symptoms or NOSIS. Only recently, coprolalia has been identified as a core symptom in functional tic-like behaviors (FTLB), a relatively new and escalating presentation of a functional movement disorder (FMD). Today it is well-established that FTLB and TS represent two distinct clinical entities, although FTLB is a common comorbidity in TS. The overlap of diseases and disorders with the more incongruent presentations of FMD are well-established clinical concepts in other neurological disorders. This raises the clinically important question as to whether coprolalia as a complex tic can be differentiated at all from "coprolalia-like" words as FTLB. Here, we want to introduce a novel concept regarding the classification of coprolalia, copropraxia, and NOSIS. We propose that it is important to consider the presence of obscene and/or socially inappropriate words, behaviors and/or insults as being more supportive of FTLB or a combination of both TS plus comorbid FTLB as opposed to being considered to be complex tic phenomena, since coprolalia and copropraxia are rare in TS. Given what we know about FTLB today, the symptom construct of NOSIS is probably not a separate symptom entity in TS. We therefore suggest that NOSIS should be preferable considered as comorbid FTLB. We believe that this novel re-conceptualization will lead us toward some explanations around inconsistent findings related to coprophenomena in TS. Furthermore, it is of high clinical relevance, since it opens wider management and treatment strategies including psychological interventions for people suffering from coprolalia, copropraxia, and NOSIS and will hopefully prevent these patients from inappropriate or even harmful treatments including invasive surgical therapies when being mistakenly classified as severely affected and treatment resistant patients with TS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.