Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42890768›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026

Incremental value of dedicated [

Phattaraphorn Teungsang, Methawee Laohamethanee, Napat Kitkhuandee, Thanapol Kliteneam, Daris Theerakulpisut

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Phattaraphorn TeungsangFaculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Methawee LaohamethaneeFaculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Napat KitkhuandeeFaculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Thanapol KliteneamFaculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Daris TheerakulpisutDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rest/stress [ Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed 174 patients-totaling 2,958 myocardial segments-who underwent both protocols. Intermodality correlation was assessed, and the rates of segmental and patient-level reclassification (segments converting from <50% maximum uptake on sestamibi to ≥50% maximum uptake on thallium) were quantified. Results: While a moderately high correlation was observed between the baseline uptake scores of the two modalities (Spearman's r = 0.817 for rest sestamibi vs. thallium), thallium imaging provided substantial additional information, with 48.0% of segments classified as fixed defects on sestamibi SPECT demonstrating improved uptake on thallium SPECT. At the patient level, 78.9% of individuals who had fixed defects on the initial sestamibi SPECT had at least one segment reclassified. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that a rest sestamibi uptake score of <20% predicted a lack of reclassification with 99% specificity, although with low sensitivity (12%). Conclusion: In a selected cohort of patients presenting with fixed defects on standard rest/stress sestamibi SPECT MPI, supplementary imaging with thallium myocardial CZT SPECT provided incremental data, altering the clinical interpretation in nearly 80% of patients. However, in the absence of an independent viability reference standard, this finding represents intertracer diagnostic reclassification rather than proven functional recovery. A rest sestamibi uptake of <20% demonstrated high specificity for non-reclassification; however, this cutoff should be interpreted cautiously as a potential gatekeeping finding when considering downstream testing rather than a rigid rule for omitting further myocardial viability evaluation.

Indexed as

cardiovascular imagingmyocardial perfusion abnormalityperfusion defect quantificationradionuclide imagingsestamibi myocardial imagingSPECT MPIthallium (I) chloride

Identifiers

PMID42890768
PMCPMC13672228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.