ReviewClinical interventions in aging2026
Lactate-Informed Exercise Prescription in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease: A Translational Framework for Preserving Cognition, Mobility, and Independence.
Review in Clinical interventions in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This narrative review proposes a conceptual, lactate-informed framework for individualized exercise prescription in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Exercise is recommended in these populations, but fixed external doses do not account for heterogeneity in disease stage, frailty, sarcopenia, cardiovascular risk, or recovery. Main Text: We integrate clinical exercise evidence, geriatric assessment, lactate physiology, muscle-brain signaling, implementation science, and trial methodology. The framework uses peripheral blood lactate as one component of a monitoring matrix with workload, heart rate, blood pressure, perceived exertion, fatigue recovery, gait safety, adherence, and caregiver support. Repeated, standardized lactate responses are classified as low, adaptive and recoverable, excessive, or non-interpretable/unsafe, prompting stepwise adjustment of aerobic, resistance, balance, and cognitive-motor training. Peripheral blood lactate is an internal-load marker; it does not directly quantify blood-brain barrier transport, CNS lactate kinetics, or target engagement. Mechanistic pathways involving monocarboxylate transport, HCAR1, BDNF/VEGF, myokines, and lactylation therefore remain hypotheses to be tested in humans with MCI or AD. Conclusions: The novelty of the framework is its integration of disease stage, geriatric phenotype, peripheral metabolic response, and recovery into clinically actionable dose decisions rather than a universal lactate threshold. Prospective multicenter trials should standardize sampling, validate response thresholds, and determine whether this approach improves cognition, mobility, independence, safety, and caregiver-relevant outcomes beyond usual advice or fixed-dose exercise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.