ArticleNanophotonics (Berlin, Germany)2026
Surrogate Scattering Matrix-Guided Inverse Design of Nanophotonic Neural Networks.
Article in Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optical computing offers a route to address the growing computational demands of machine learning, with inverse-designed nanophotonic media providing a compact path to passive optical operators. Training such devices end to end remains expensive because each geometry update requires full-wave forward and adjoint evaluations. We introduce a surrogate-guided inverse-design framework that separates task learning from electromagnetic realization. Classification is first solved in matrix space using a passive complex operator with bounded singular values, and the resulting target is transferred to a fabrication-aware freeform device through complex transmission matching and reflection suppression. Because the realization target is fixed, the electromagnetic work per update is determined by the input and output port counts and is independent of training-set size. A locality-constrained router composed with a fixed evanescent mixing stage extends the approach to 16-port transformations. Under the same physical initialization, solver, fabrication map, and 550-solve budget, operator matching reached 98.34% test accuracy on MedNIST, compared with 89.50% for direct geometry-to-task training. On RSSCN7, the combined optical surrogate reached 48.21%, compared with 38.57% for a PCA-16 ridge classifier. Three Yin-Yang realizations reached
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.