ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding enteral nutrition interruption management in intensive care units: a multicenter cross-sectional study predominantly among nurses.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Enteral nutrition (EN) is essential for critically ill patients, yet enteral nutrition interruption (ENI) is common in intensive care unit (ICU) and compromises nutrient delivery. ENI reflects clinical conditions, workflows, team collaboration, and bedside implementation, but how knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) interact remains unclear. Objective: To assess ENI-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices among ICU healthcare professionals, predominantly nurses, and examine their interrelationships and associations with training, demographic, and organizational factors. Methods: This multicenter cross-sectional survey included 478 ICU healthcare professionals from 14 hospitals in Shandong and Henan, China, between December 2025 and February 2026; 93.5% were nurses. Self-reported KAP were assessed using a validated questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, Spearman correlation, multiple linear regression, and observed-variable path analysis were conducted. Results: Self-assessed knowledge scores were lower than attitude and practice scores, particularly for items related to the operational definitions of ENI. The three KAP domains were positively correlated, with the strongest correlation between knowledge and practice (ρ = 0.738, Conclusion: Among ICU healthcare professionals, predominantly nurses, self-reported ENI management practices were associated with knowledge and attitudes, with attitudes potentially playing an intermediary role. EN-related training was also associated with more favorable KAP scores, while organizational and workflow factors may contribute to the observed variation. These findings may help identify potential targets for future intervention development and evaluation but do not establish causal relationships or improvements in actual ENI management, nutrient delivery, or patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.