ArticleFrontiers in medical technology2026
A data-driven and interpretable hybrid quantum-classical model for male infertility risk assessment.
Article in Frontiers in medical technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Nearly 15% of couples worldwide experience infertility, with Male Infertility (MI) accounting for 30-50% of these cases. Despite this burden, research on MI lags behind female infertility, particularly in understanding how demographic, clinical, lifestyle, and environmental factors interact to shape reproductive outcomes. Traditional approaches typically examine isolated indicators and struggle to capture the high-dimensional, nonlinear patterns present in Electronic Health Record (EHR) data. This study proposes a data-driven, interpretable framework integrating global fertility rate trends with EHR-derived male fertility data to (i) identify key determinants of MI, (ii) compare multiple classical Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) architectures against a novel Quantum LSTM model embedding a Variational Quantum Circuit (VQC) directly within the LSTM gating mechanism, and (iii) evaluate the feasibility of quantum-enhanced sequential learning on small, heterogeneous healthcare datasets. Methods: Two public datasets were used: a global fertility rate time series (1960-2020) and an EHR-derived male fertility dataset ( Results: Among classical models, unilateral LSTM performed most consistently (91.2% accuracy on fertility-rate data; 92.1% on male-fertility data). The Quantum LSTM achieved the highest accuracy on both datasets (92.6% and 93.8% respectively), a modest but statistically significant improvement (Wilcoxon Discussion: These findings demonstrate the feasibility of embedding quantum circuits within LSTM gating for small-scale healthcare prediction tasks, yielding incremental rather than transformative gains over classical architectures. Observed associations are exploratory and non-causal, and given the limited sample size (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.