ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
The effects of core training on athletic performance (speed and jumping) in different sports: a meta-analysis.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to conduct a comprehensive, holistic examination, using meta-analysis, of the effects of core stabilisation training on speed and jumping-key indicators of athletic performance-in individuals participating in various sports. Methods: Studies published in Web of Science, PubMed and Google Scholar between 2020 and June 2026 examining speed and jumping performance were screened. Studies involving pre-test-post-test designs with experimental and control groups were recorded for analysis. A total of 49 studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included. This meta-analysis followed the PRISMA statement reporting guidelines. The CMA Ver. 2.0 statistical package was used to assess publication bias, calculate means and standard deviations, determine effect sizes and perform moderator analyses. The I² statistic assessed heterogeneity between studies; 25 per cent, 50 per cent and 75 per cent cut-off values represent low, moderate and high levels, respectively. Due to anticipated clinical and methodological diversity across sports disciplines, participant competitive levels, and test protocols, a random-effects model was applied Results: The findings of this meta-analysis, which included a total of 49 studies, indicate that core training has a positive effect on the speed and jumping performance of individuals participating in various sports. The overall effect size calculated for speed performance was 0.601, whilst the overall effect size for jumping performance was determined to be 0.489. These findings indicate that core training has a positive effect on both speed and jumping performance. Conclusions: Core training is a useful complementary method for improving speed and jumping performance. Its effectiveness depends not only on training duration and sample size but also on exercise selection, intensity, frequency, athlete characteristics, and sport specificity. Therefore, combining core training with sport-specific sprint, strength, and plyometric exercises may enhance athletic performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.