ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2026
Validating the standard model of diffusion MRI in white matter with numerical substrates.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The non-invasive estimation of intra- and extracellular microstructural parameters using biophysical models has been a major focus in brain microstructure imaging with MRI. The Standard Model (SM) of diffusion in white matter (WM) provides a unifying framework for various modelling approaches, representing axons as impermeable sticks embedded within a locally anisotropic extra-axonal space. However, the SM relies on simplifying assumptions that may not hold in realistic WM tissue, as they do not take into account axonal undulations, beading, the presence of glial cells, or membrane permeability. In this work, we investigate how SM parameter estimates, derived using the Standard Model Imaging (SMI) framework, behave when the model is applied to realistic numerical WM substrates generated by the CATERPillar tool. Specifically, we vary (i) axonal morphological features such as beading and undulations, (ii) axonal packing density, (iii) orientation dispersion, (iv) membrane permeability of axons and astrocytes separately, (v) myelin volume fraction, and (vi) diffusion time. In each part of the analysis, different noise levels are introduced. Our findings enable users to identify potential biases introduced by varying conditions and to adjust their interpretations accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.