ArticleNeurophotonics2026
Multiscale neural signatures of long-lag repetition learning: a simultaneous fNIRS-EEG study.
Article in Neurophotonics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Significance: Repetition-based learning supports word recognition and reading fluency, yet its neural mechanisms remain poorly understood, particularly where deficits in consolidating repeated linguistic input may underlie reading and language difficulties. Establishing reliable neural markers of repetition-based learning is a critical first step toward characterizing the phenotypes of these difficulties in children. Aim: We developed a whole-brain simultaneous functional near-infrared spectroscopy-electroencephalography (fNIRS-EEG) approach to capture fast temporal electrophysiological and spatially accurate hemodynamic signals during long-lag repetition learning. Approach: Thirty participants performed a semantic judgment task with words repeated across four runs with intervening items, modeling repetition demands central to reading instruction. A multimodal decoding framework integrating electrophysiological, hemodynamic, and cross-modal fNIRS-EEG correlation features was used to classify repetition-based learning. Results: Repeated words showed response time reductions. EEG captured a frontal N400-range repetition-related negativity and attenuation of alpha-beta suppression, reflecting changes in recognition-related and post-recognition processing. fNIRS revealed left inferior frontal and superior temporal efficiency increases alongside right supramarginal activation, suggesting integrative processing. Multimodal classifiers outperformed unimodal classifiers, indicating that each modality captured complementary aspects of learning. Conclusions: Combining fNIRS and EEG with multimodal machine learning provides a richer characterization of repetition-based learning than either modality alone, establishing a framework for phenotyping language learning capacity and identifying neural markers of reading difficulties in pediatric populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.