ReviewFrontiers in public health2026
Community health workers and
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Agricultural workers in the United States face a disproportionate burden of infectious diseases, including tuberculosis, HIV, coccidioidomycosis, viral hepatitis, and COVID-19, driven by occupational exposures, crowded housing, poverty, and limited healthcare access. Despite this burden, farmworkers have among the lowest rates of healthcare utilization of any US working population, and traditional clinic-based delivery models are poorly suited to the realities of agricultural labor. Community health workers (CHWs), known as promotores de salud in Latino communities, offer a well-established strategy for bridging this gap through shared language, culture, and lived experience with the communities they serve. This mini-review synthesizes evidence on CHW and promotora interventions for infectious disease prevention and care among agricultural workers, with particular attention to California's farmworker communities. Available evidence supports CHW roles in COVID-19 vaccination and outreach, tuberculosis treatment adherence through community-based directly observed therapy, HIV prevention and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) navigation, and hepatitis screening and linkage to care. However, existing programs have largely operated in isolation, and, to our knowledge, no CHW intervention for coccidioidomycosis has been developed despite its importance as an occupational infectious disease in California. To address this fragmentation, we propose a three-tiered framework that extends CHW roles from community-based prevention and early recognition to screening, linkage, and treatment support, and ultimately to formal integration with healthcare and public health systems. Implementing this framework will require infectious disease-specific training in the languages of the communities served, sustainable financing, and rigorous evaluation of an integrated cross-disease CHW model in California's agricultural communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.