ArticleBiomedical optics express2026
Retardance2Retardance: unsupervised denoising for polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography (PS-OCT) enables advanced micron-scale characterization of biological tissues. However, its quantitative diagnostic utility is fundamentally limited by the presence of speckle and associated polarimetric noise. Conventional spatial filtering techniques suppress speckle effects yet compromise spatial resolution and can introduce severe coordinate-transformation artifacts in catheter-based applications. To address these challenges, we present the Retardance2Retardance (R2R) network, a physics-constrained, self-supervised deep learning framework for robust polarimetric speckle suppression. R2R exploits spectral binning to obtain independent speckle realizations from existing data and train the model in a Noise2Noise fashion without ground truth. A physics-informed regularization in the loss function enforces that the denoised polarization effects correspond to retardance. Additionally, a physics-informed data augmentation (PIDA) strategy prevents the network from overfitting to the static polarimetric system effects inherent to the training data. Applied to independent human coronary artery pullbacks acquired
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.