ReviewMetabolism open2026
Cardiometabolic medicine in China: Burden, challenges, and strategic priorities.
Review in Metabolism open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of cardiometabolic medicine (CMM) reflects a shift in cardiovascular disease (CVD) management from organ-based care toward greater cross-system integration. CMM integrates cardiovascular, endocrine, renal, and public health domains to address the bidirectional interplay between metabolic dysfunction and CVD. In this review, we trace the conceptual evolution from metabolic syndrome to cardiometabolic disease (CMD), synthesize evidence for the biological integration of cardiovascular, metabolic, and renal disease, individual cardiometabolic therapies, and emerging integrated care models, and discuss the epidemiological transition and implementation barriers in China, including service fragmentation, specialty silos, and limited patient engagement. Strategic priorities include a coordinated CMM framework, multidisciplinary care, standardized training, primary-tertiary care linkage, and digital implementation, together with measurable indicators for implementation and outcomes. China's experience may offer relevant lessons for other Asian settings navigating similar transitions, suggesting that CMM may be viewed not simply as a new organizational construct, but as a potential realignment of chronic disease management toward integrated, patient-centered, and life-course cardiovascular health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.