ReviewAdvances in medical education and practice2026
Gamification and Game-Based Learning in Interprofessional Health Professions Education: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.
Review in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Interprofessional education (IPE) prepares healthcare professionals for collaborative practice. Gamification and game-based learning (GBL) are increasingly used in health professions education, and multiple studies have examined their design, targeted competencies, and educational outcomes in IPE. However, the existing literature has not been adequately summarized. This systematic review aimed to summarize the available literature on the design, implementation, targeted competencies, and educational outcomes of gamification and GBL interventions in IPE. Methods: A systematic review with narrative synthesis was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Five databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and ERIC) were searched up to December 8, 2025. Eligible studies included participants from at least two health professions, used explicit game-based or gamified features, and reported educational outcomes. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) 2018. Findings were synthesized narratively using IPEC competency domains and a modified Kirkpatrick evaluation framework. Results: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria and involved more than 15 health professions across diverse educational settings. Educational escape rooms were the most common intervention (7/15), followed by serious games (4/15). Teamwork and collaboration were the most frequently targeted competencies, followed by interprofessional communication and roles and responsibilities. Outcomes were concentrated at early Kirkpatrick levels: 13 studies reported learner reactions (Level 1), 13 assessed attitudes or perceptions (Level 2a), and 6 reported knowledge or skills outcomes (Level 2b). No study demonstrated organizational or patient-level outcomes, and evidence of sustained transfer to clinical practice was lacking. Conclusion: Gamification and GBL show potential as complementary approaches to enhance engagement, teamwork, and communication in IPE. However, evidence of sustained behavioral change and clinical impact remains limited. Future research should employ more rigorous designs, standardized outcome measures, and evaluation of higher-level educational and healthcare outcomes, particularly in underrepresented settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.