ArticleClinical parkinsonism & related disorders2026
Comprehensive genetic screening of the South African Parkinson's disease study collection using the NeuroBooster array.
Article in Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Although there have been significant advances in the genetic etiology of Parkinson's disease (PD), most of this research has been conducted in European populations. This study aimed to characterize the genetic landscape of PD in South Africa, whose populations are renowned for their extensive genetic diversity and admixture. Methods: We recruited 689 PD probands across South Africa. These participants were genotyped using the NeuroBooster array in collaboration with the Global Parkinson's Genetics Program (GP2). An in-house computational workflow was used to identify pathogenic missense variants, which were validated using Sanger sequencing. The CNV-Finder pipeline was used to screen for copy number variations (CNVs), which were validated using Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA). Previously identified pathogenic variants were used as positive controls in our analysis. Results: We identified 16 unique missense variants in 47 individuals, 15 of which were independently confirmed by Sanger sequencing. However, these variants are not considered likely to be associated with PD status. We also identified new homozygous Conclusions: We conducted the largest pathogenic variant screening to date in this unique and underrepresented population, and our findings highlight the rare contribution of known pathogenic variants. This study underscores the importance of expanding genetic research in African cohorts to improve global understanding of PD etiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.