Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42890355›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Laryngeal vs. Esophageal Acid-Mediated Injury in Bulimia Nervosa: A Systematic Review.

Sheilan Pouri, Sophia Cresitello, Kristina Shaw, Alina Zgardau, Ahmad Ahmadi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sheilan PouriMedicine, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Davie, USA.
Sophia CresitelloMedicine, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Davie, USA.
Kristina ShawMedicine, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Davie, USA.
Alina ZgardauMedicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, CAN.
Ahmad AhmadiAnatomy/Neuroanatomy/Dentistry, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bulimia nervosa (BN) is a psychiatric eating disorder that can potentially be life-threatening and is characterized by recurrent binging and/or purging. During purging episodes that involve self-induced vomiting, laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) can occur as gastric acid is forcefully pushed through the esophageal sphincter and anteriorly to the acid-sensitive laryngopharyngeal tissue. While the esophageal mucosal lining can tolerate repeated exposure to acid before sustaining significant erosion, the laryngeal mucosa exhibits greater sensitivity, reacting to even mild exposure with inflammation. LPR has been shown to be associated with hoarseness, capillary dilation, enlargement of soft tissue, arytenoid, and thyroid cartilages, and thick mucus over the larynx. Individual studies have also been conducted on how the larynx sustains injury at higher pH levels compared to the esophagus. However, no literature review has yet synthesized why exactly the larynx experiences disproportionate vulnerability due to anatomical, histological, and acid-tolerance mechanisms. As such, this review aims to consolidate evidence on how injury to the larynx is greater than that to the esophagus among BN patients engaging in self-induced vomiting. The 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used for this analysis. A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase between 1957 and 2026 using two separate Boolean search strings: one primary search for primary, clinical, and population-level evidence on BN and/or laryngopharyngeal/esophageal pathology, and a secondary search to collect mechanistic and background literature. Eligible studies examined acid-mediated injury, laryngeal pathology, esophageal pathology, or comparative mucosal damage in BN or LPR. Excluded studies included non-peer-reviewed sources and opinion pieces unrelated to BN, LPR, or acid-mediated mucosal injury. Through the primary Boolean search (Search 1), nine studies met eligibility criteria and were used as primary evidence. These nine studies were supplemented by 12 mechanistic sources that were found through the second Boolean search string (Search 2); 10 foundational sources were identified through reference list chaining and included in this review. A total of 31 sources were included in the synthesis of this review, with two additional references used purely for methodological purposes (the PRISMA 2020 statement and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale), for a total of 33 cited references. Across primary studies, 51 unique subjects were represented, 30 of whom had a formal BN diagnosis. An additional 380 subjects were represented throughout the mechanistic/supporting review literature examining general LPR and/or GERD populations. Across studies, laryngeal mucosa sustained earlier and more severe pathological changes compared to esophageal mucosa among BN patients. These findings indicate the larynx is disproportionately injured in BN due to markedly lower acid-exposure tolerance thresholds, thinner epithelium, and reduced buffering capacity of the mucosa. Prospective studies comparing laryngeal and esophageal mucosal outcomes among BN patients are warranted. Laryngeal symptoms in clinical settings, such as hoarseness, may help improve early diagnostic precision and implement interventional strategies, supporting otolaryngologic involvement in multidisciplinary care for this understudied patient population.

Indexed as

acid-mediated injurybulimia nervosadysphoniaesophageal mucosafunctional anatomy of the larynxgastroesophageal reflux disease (gerd)laryngopharyngeal reflux (lpr)multidisciplinary care teampepsin enzymevocal fold

Identifiers

PMID42890355
PMCPMC13671381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.