ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2026
Inter-vessel heterogeneity in coronary microvascular dysfunction: A three-vessel physiological assessment.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is typically assessed in the left anterior descending artery (LAD); however, inter-vessel differences involving the left circumflex (LCX) and right coronary arteries (RCA) remain unclear. We investigated inter-vessel variations in CMD and their associations with patient characteristics. Methods and results: We retrospectively analyzed 91 patients (overall cohort) to evaluate patient characteristics across different coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) phenotypes based on physiological cutoffs: isolated CFR impairment, isolated IMR impairment, and combined impairment. Additionally, in a subgroup of 34 patients who successfully underwent physiological assessments in all three major coronary arteries (three-vessel cohort), we compared the CMD diagnostic rates between LAD-only and three-vessel assessments and evaluated vessel-specific correlations between CFR and IMR. In the Overall cohort, analysis of vessel-specific phenotypes revealed that patients with isolated IMR impairment in the LAD had a significantly higher body mass index (26.4 ± 4.90 kg/m Conclusions: Coronary microvascular physiology varies across the LAD, LCX, and RCA, indicating that conventional LAD-only assessments may underestimate CMD burden. These preliminary retrospective findings require validation in prospective, multicenter studies before routine clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.