ArticleThe journal of liquid biopsy2026
HER2 phenotyping of CTCs in breast cancer: a comparison across the spectrum of tissue HER2 expression level.
Article in The journal of liquid biopsy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Assessing and trackinghuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in breast cancer (BC) is essential for selecting the right targeted therapies, but conventional tissue biopsies fall short because they cannot fully reflect tumor heterogeneity or provide ongoing, real-time monitoring. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) provide a minimally invasive way to dynamically assess HER2 status, but they still require further validation and standardization before routine clinical use. Methods: We compared the HER2 expression on CTCs through a quantitative assessment using the ACCEPT tool across patients with BC with different HER2 status on tissue (positive, low and null). The proportion of HER2-expressing CTCs in individual samples (CTC-HER2ratio) was calculated and correlation with tissue HER2 status was analyzed in a cohort of patients with metastatic BC (MBC) to define an optimal cutoff value for discrimination by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: A total of 143 patients were included. The median CTC-HER2ratio was significantly higher in patients with HER2-positive (HER2+) tumors compared to HER2-negative (HER2-)tumors (30% vs 9%, p = 0.0003). The ROC curve yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.7417 for distinguishing HER2+ from HER2- disease, with an exploratory optimal cutoff of 0.22. In contrast, the CTC-HER2ratio did not significantly differentiate HER2-low from HER2-null tumors (p = 0.327; AUC 0.5646), highlighting limited resolution in the low-expression range. Conclusions: This proof-of-concept study suggests that a ratio-based assessment of HER2 expression on CTCs may capture biological heterogeneity and correlate with tissue HER2 status. However, the modest discriminative performance and limited resolution in the HER2-low range indicate that further prospective validation is necessary before clinical integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.